From CIRCA

LaTeX code for Viral Analytics interview Results

Click here for a plain text version of this LaTeX code.

\documentclass[a4paper,11pt]{article}
\usepackage{ulem}
\usepackage{a4wide}
\usepackage[dvipsnames,svgnames]{xcolor}
\usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx}

\usepackage{hyperref}
% commands generated by html2latex


\begin{document}

This is out of 8 people.
\begin{itemize}
	\item  5 people liked Cirrus.  
	\item  5 people liked Frequency Grid. 
	\item  4 people thought Links was useful, while one person did not like Links. 
	\item  3 people thought Summary was good and 1 person thought it was not useful.  
	\item  2 people liked Reader.
	\item  2 people thought Reader was not effective since it was too small.  
	\item  2 people thought the window was too small. 
	\item  One person liked that you could scrape particular issues in an article.  
	\item  One person did not like the diffusion of tools. 
	\item  One person found it hard to see the functionality of the tool.
\end{itemize}


\\
\begin{itemize}
	\item  5 people would like searchability or link ability for articles. 
	\item  2 people would find a concordance useful.  
	\item  One person would like the Links to navigate between articles in the entire journal.  
	\item  One person would like a tool to conduct text analysis on all articles in journal.  
	\item  One person would like a trend list to find trends in a particular field.  
	\item  One person would like summary to link to an article.  
	\item  One person would like collocates.  
	\item  One person would like Voyeur on Omeca.  
	\item  One person would like more visualizations.  
	\item  One person would like link analysis.  
	\item  One person would like a TEI wrapper.  
	\item  One person would like a personography/placeography markup.  
\end{itemize}


\\
\begin{itemize}
	\item  2 people would like the visualizations to bring all 6 tools together.
	\item  One person said readers are suspicious of text analysis since it is seen as a bibliographical searching.  
	\item  One person said there are too many options that will overwhelm users.  
	\item  One person said it was good for quantitative research.  
	\item  One person said it would be better if based in the cloud.  
	\item  One person said it needs more robust digitization tools.
\end{itemize}

\end{document}