From CIRCA

LaTeX code for Viral Analytics additional Features

Click here for a plain text version of this LaTeX code.

\documentclass[a4paper,11pt]{article}
\usepackage{ulem}
\usepackage{a4wide}
\usepackage[dvipsnames,svgnames]{xcolor}
\usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx}

\usepackage{hyperref}
% commands generated by html2latex


\begin{document}

These are the additional features that came up in the interviews.
\begin{itemize}
	\item  A tool that allows you to search or summarize articles in the entire journal.  
	\item  The tool would be better if it was ???able to pull up words in context, such as a concordance.??? 
	\item  It would be nice if the tool came up as a stable pre-formed page with many tools displayed at the same time.  The search on frequency grid and cirrus should be pre-run and displayed once the page is opened.  The tools should then be separated down the page similar to Google Books.  
	\item  eVoyeur would be better with a TEI wrapper and personography and placeography markup.  
	\item  The tool should be capable of processing unstructured data with both XML and HTML.  
	\item  Someone would like to see a more robust set of digitalization tools for text analysis.  
	\item  It would also be good to look at text in multiple versions and see the differences between versions.  
	\item  A visualization tool to bring together all 5 tools would be useful. 
	\item  Name and entity recognition would be important.  
	\item  If the tool could be used effectively in an archive it would be better. 
	\item  It would be nice for it to break down authors and themes in articles. 
	\item  Links to see connections between articles in the entire journal would be useful so you can see issues throughout the entire journal.  
	\item  Better searchability or linkability would be good.  
	\item  It would be nice to take all the data in the journal and conduct text analysis.  
	\item  A trend list to find trends in a particular field would be useful. 
	\item  Someone is interested in discourse, how authors speak of topics and how it changed over time or change between institutions.  
\end{itemize}\hypertarget{Is_eVoyeur_useful.3F}{}

\subsubsection{Is eVoyeur useful?}
\begin{itemize}
	\item  Someone would like the tool to do more such as collocates and concordances.  
	\item  eVoyeur is useful if you want to do more quantitative research. 
	\item  It would be better if it were entirely web based and located in the cloud.  
	\item  eVoyeur would be useful but most readers are suspicious of the text analysis route.  
	\item  They see it as bibliographic searching and giving the user too many options without asking them if they want the tools may overwhelm the user.  
	\item  Voyeur should have an API or be integrated in the interface.  
	\item  The tools should be XML aware in order to be valuable.
\end{itemize}

\end{document}