CIRCA:Assessment Tools

From CIRCA

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 146: Line 146:
Recommended use with Framework:
Recommended use with Framework:
 +
*Simon, "Administrative Behavior", 1947.
==[[CIRCA: Basic Statistical Analysis|Statistical Analysis]]==
==[[CIRCA: Basic Statistical Analysis|Statistical Analysis]]==

Revision as of 14:39, 7 November 2013

This page gathers together a variety of techniques for evaluating and assessing video games.

Contents

General List of Assessment Techniques

Note: See the Assessment Framework for more information regarding the assessment frameworking we're developing

Qualitative Assessment Techniques

Qualitative techniques are likely to dominate video game assessment, for the success of a video game experience is often predicated upon difficult to quantify human elements such as "fun" and "enjoyment".

Evaluation by Game Creators

Evaluation by Game Players

Game players may be asked to evaluate a game in a variety of ways.


Quantitative Assessment Techniques

Quantitative assessment of video games generally entails analyzing data collected about the progress of players through the game.

Quantitative assessment can involve the measurement of:

  • of tickets/tokens purchased
  • Success/failure rates
  • Journaling
  • Time in-game
  • Amount of content interacted with
  • Locations the game was accessed from
  • specific times the game was accessed


Specific approaches to projects

Draft Revised List For Methods/Techniques

Note: Below is a list of some methods that may be used to assess parts of game design and assessment. Each method includes a brief explanation why it may be relevant to design as well as a few associated sources from our literature review. Please feel free to add or the revise to the list.

Guidelines for Methods:

  • Add only relevant methods.
  • Use a brief description to define the method.
  • Link it to relevant literature in the Literature Review & Precises section when possible.
  • Use proper citation
  • Alphabetical order is preferred.
  • Link to the Grand Assessment Framework for which method may be useful for which section of the framework. For example, Interviewing can be linked to Stakeholders and Expectations as '1.0', under recommended use with framework.

AB Testing

Testing your current design against alternative ones to determine which ones produce positive results.

Recommended Use with the Framework:

Associated Literature:

Charters

Recommended Use with the Framework:

Associated Literature:

Developmental Evaluation

Developmental Evaluation makes use of a developmental evaluator to inquire into developments, track developments, facilitate interpretation of developments and their significance, and engages with multiple parties engaged in and affected by the product regarding making judgements about what is being developing, how long it is being developed, and the consequences and impacts of what has been developed, and what are the next stages of development.

Recommended Use with Framework:

Associated Literature:

  • Patton, Michael. Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use . New York: Guiford, 2011.

Digitization

The conversion of information into a digital format. Digitization makes information easier to preserve, access, and share.

Recommended Use with the Framework:

Associated Literature:

Feature Testing

Controls users' exposure to specific features or concepts of a product that are then tested against one another. It aims to understand how users will react to the project, with all its features, by exposing them to each hypothetical design at a time.

Recommended Use with the Framework:

Associated Literature:

  • Laurel, Brenda. "Design Research:Methods and Perspectives". Massachusetts: Institute of Technology. 2003.

Focus Groups

Asking a group of people about their perceptions, opinions, beliefs, and attitudes regarding a product, issue, service, or idea.

Recommended Use with the Framework:

Associated Literature:

Historical Methods

Recommended Use with the Framework:

Associated Literature:

Iterative Iteration

Based on a cyclical process of prototyping, testing, analysis, and refining a work in progress. It can be boiled down to test, analyze, refine, repeat.

Recommended Use with the Framework:

Associated Literature:

  • Laurel, Brenda. "Design Research:Methods and Perspectives". Massachusetts: Institute of Technology. 2003.

Interviewing

Asking questions or talking to interviewees to gain insight into 'subjective understanding'.

Recommended Use with the Framework:

Associated Literature:

  • Laurel, Brenda. "Design Research:Methods and Perspectives". Massachusetts: Institute of Technology. 2003.

Journaling

Keeping reflective reports during the progress of the project.

Recommended Use with the Framework:

Associated Literature:

  • Ortlipp, Michelle. "Keeping and Using Reflective Journals in the Qualitative Research Process". In The Qualitative Report. 14.4 (2008):695-705.

Persona Scenarios

The use of archetypal users with specific goals and needs based on who would be using your your project. The ultimate goal of personas is to identify specific user goals and needs so they can be aligned with business needs and goals to create an agreed upon list of features and functions.

Recommended Use with the Framework:

Associated Literature:

  • Laurel, Brenda. "Design Research:Methods and Perspectives". Massachusetts: Institute of Technology. 2003.

Play-Testing

Play-testing focuses on measuring the product’s quality and functionality.

Recommended Use with Framework:

Associated Literature:

  • Warren, Scott, Greg Jones, and Line Lin. "Usability and Play Testing: The Often Missed Assessment." In Serious Educational Game Assessment: Practical Methods and Models for Educational Games, Simulations and Virtual Worlds . Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2011. 131-146.

Rational planning model

The process of realizing a problem, establishing and evaluating planning criteria, creating alternatives, implementing alternatives, and monitoring progress of the alternatives. It is a multi-step model for making logically sound decisions that aims to follow the orderly path from problem identification through solution.

Associated Literature:

Recommended use with Framework:

  • Simon, "Administrative Behavior", 1947.

Statistical Analysis

The collection and interpretation of statistical data. Statistics are frequently used to find relationships between data sets, extracting important properties from data sets, and visualizations.

Recommended Use with the Framework:

Associated Literature:

Standardized Criteria

Including checklists and rubrics, standardized criteria sets expectations and a focus on measuring specific objectives.

Recommended Use with Framework:

Associated Literature:

Success/Failure Counters

The use of counters to determine the success or failure of measurable factors.

Recommended Use with the Framework==

Associated Literature:

Talk Aloud

Gathering data by having users talk aloud as they perform a set of tasks. Users are asked to say whatever they are looking at, thinking, doing, and feeling as they go about their task, allowing observers to know the process of task completion from the user point of view.

Recommended Use with the Framework:

Associated Literature:

Text Methods

Analyzing a text to describe and interpret its content.

Recommended Use with the Framework:

Associated Literature:

Usability-Testing

Usability-testing focuses on measuring the capacity for the product to meet its intended purposes with the use of user-centered interaction.

Recommended Use with Framework:

Associated Literature:

Personal tools