CIRCA:Viral Analytics questionnaire

From CIRCA

Revision as of 11:49, 1 October 2010 by AshleyMoroz (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

1. How familiar are you with Voyeur, a text analysis tool?

    1=not familiar  2=somewhat  familiar  3=very familiar  4=never used it before

2. Does your journal see voyeur as a useful tool for text analysis?

3. Would your journal be interested in testing out voyeur by embedding it in your journal?

For questions 4-11 please answer as to what would be important for an embedded tool in your journal. 4. The use texts in a variety of formats including plain text, HTML, XML, PDF, RTF and MS Word.

    1=not important  2=somewhat  important  3=very important  4=not applicable

5. The option to add texts from different locations, including URLs and uploaded files to compare to the article.

    1=not important  2=somewhat  important  3=very important  4=not applicable

6. Perform lexical analysis including the study of frequency and distribution data.

    1=not important  2=somewhat  important  3=very important  4=not applicable

7. Export data into other tools (as XML, tab separated values, etc.)

    1=not important  2=somewhat  important  3=very important  4=not applicable

8. More advanced linguistic processing (lemmatization, parts of speech, semantic awareness)

    1=not important  2=somewhat  important  3=very important  4=not applicable

9. XML-aware analytic features

    1=not important  2=somewhat  important  3=very important  4=not applicable

10. Proximity searching of terms

    1=not important  2=somewhat  important  3=very important  4=not applicable

11. Multi-word (n-gram) views

    1=not important  2=somewhat  important  3=very important  4=not applicable

12. Are there any features not mentioned above that would be important in your journal?

Personal tools