CIRCA:Viral Analytics questionnaire

From CIRCA

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
1=not familiar  2=somewhat  familiar  3=very familiar  4=never used it before
1=not familiar  2=somewhat  familiar  3=very familiar  4=never used it before
 +
2. Does your journal see voyeur as a useful tool for text analysis?
2. Does your journal see voyeur as a useful tool for text analysis?
 +
3. Would your journal be interested in testing out voyeur by embedding it in your journal?
3. Would your journal be interested in testing out voyeur by embedding it in your journal?
For questions 4-11 please answer as to what would be important for an embedded tool in your journal.
For questions 4-11 please answer as to what would be important for an embedded tool in your journal.
 +
4. The use texts in a variety of formats including plain text, HTML, XML, PDF, RTF and MS Word.
4. The use texts in a variety of formats including plain text, HTML, XML, PDF, RTF and MS Word.
1=not important  2=somewhat  important  3=very important  4=not applicable
1=not important  2=somewhat  important  3=very important  4=not applicable
 +
5. The option to add texts from different locations, including URLs and uploaded files to compare to the article.
5. The option to add texts from different locations, including URLs and uploaded files to compare to the article.

Revision as of 11:52, 1 October 2010

1. How familiar are you with Voyeur, a text analysis tool?

1=not familiar 2=somewhat familiar 3=very familiar 4=never used it before


2. Does your journal see voyeur as a useful tool for text analysis?


3. Would your journal be interested in testing out voyeur by embedding it in your journal?

For questions 4-11 please answer as to what would be important for an embedded tool in your journal.


4. The use texts in a variety of formats including plain text, HTML, XML, PDF, RTF and MS Word.

1=not important 2=somewhat important 3=very important 4=not applicable


5. The option to add texts from different locations, including URLs and uploaded files to compare to the article.

1=not important 2=somewhat important 3=very important 4=not applicable

6. Perform lexical analysis including the study of frequency and distribution data.

1=not important 2=somewhat important 3=very important 4=not applicable

7. Export data into other tools (as XML, tab separated values, etc.)

1=not important 2=somewhat important 3=very important 4=not applicable

8. More advanced linguistic processing (lemmatization, parts of speech, semantic awareness)

1=not important 2=somewhat important 3=very important 4=not applicable

9. XML-aware analytic features

1=not important 2=somewhat important 3=very important 4=not applicable

10. Proximity searching of terms

1=not important 2=somewhat important 3=very important 4=not applicable

11. Multi-word (n-gram) views

1=not important 2=somewhat important 3=very important 4=not applicable

12. Are there any features not mentioned above that would be important in your journal?

Personal tools