Viral Analytics interview Results

From CIRCA

VTracker
Content inserted. (1 Occurances)
Content structure inserted. (5 Occurances)
Content changed. (2 Occurances)
Content moved. (4 Occurances)
Content NEED DESCRIPTION. (1 Occurances)
Content NEED DESCRIPTION. (1 Occurances)
Content structure moved. (3 Occurances)

---

This is out of 8 people.

• 5 people liked Cirrus.
• 5 people liked Frequency Grid.
• 4 people thought Links was useful, while one person did not like Links.
• 3 people thought Summary was good and 1 person thought it was not useful.
• 2 people liked Reader.
• 2 people thought Reader was not effective since it was toosmall.
• 2 people thought the window was too small.
• One person liked that you could scrape particular issues in an article.
• One person did not like the diffusion of tools.
• One person found it hard to see the functionality of the tool.

• 5 people would like searchability or link ability for articles.
• 2 people would find a concordance useful.
• One person would like the Links to navigate between articles inthe entire journal.
• One person would like a tool to conduct text analysis on all articles in journal.
• One person would like a trend list to find trends in a particular field.
• One person would like summary to link to an article.
• One person would like collocates.
• One person would like Voyeur on Omeca.
• One person would like more visualizations.
• One person would like link analysis.
• One person would like a TEI wrapper.
• One person would like a personography/placeography markup.

• 2 people would like visulizations to bring together all 6 tools.2 people would like the visualizations to bring all 6 tools together.
• One person said readers are suspicious of text analysis since it is seen as a bibliographical searching.
• One person said there are too many options that will overwhelm users.
• One person said it was good for quantitative research.
• One person said it would be better if based in the cloud.
• One person said it needs more robust digitization tools.