CIRCA:Viral Analytics interview Results

From CIRCA

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with '* 3 people said frequency grid was good. * 3 people said cirrus was good. * 3 people said links was good. * 2 people said summary was not useful. * 3 people liked that links li…')
 
(4 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
* 3 people said frequency grid was good.
+
This is out of 8 people.
-
* 3 people said cirrus was good.
+
-
* 3 people said links was good.
+
-
* 2 people said summary was not useful.
+
* 5 people liked Cirrus. 
 +
* 5 people liked Frequency Grid.
 +
* 4 people thought Links was useful, while one person did not like Links.
 +
* 3 people thought Summary was good and 1 person thought it was not useful. 
 +
* 2 people liked Reader.
 +
* 2 people thought Reader was not effective since it was too small. 
 +
* 2 people thought the window was too small.
 +
* One person liked that you could scrape particular issues in an article. 
 +
* One person did not like the diffusion of tools.
 +
* One person found it hard to see the functionality of the tool.
-
* 3 people liked that links linked between articles.
+
 
-
* 3 people would like better link ability or search ability between articles.
+
* 5 people would like searchability or link ability for articles.  
 +
* 2 people would find a concordance useful. 
 +
* One person would like the Links to navigate between articles in the entire journal. 
 +
* One person would like a tool to conduct text analysis on all articles in journal. 
 +
* One person would like a trend list to find trends in a particular field. 
 +
* One person would like summary to link to an article. 
 +
* One person would like collocates. 
 +
* One person would like Voyeur on Omeca. 
 +
* One person would like more visualizations. 
 +
* One person would like link analysis. 
 +
* One person would like a TEI wrapper. 
 +
* One person would like a personography/placeography markup. 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
* 2 people would like the visualizations to bring all 6 tools together.
 +
* One person said readers are suspicious of text analysis since it is seen as a bibliographical searching. 
 +
* One person said there are too many options that will overwhelm users. 
 +
* One person said it was good for quantitative research. 
 +
* One person said it would be better if based in the cloud. 
 +
* One person said it needs more robust digitization tools.

Current revision as of 14:45, 11 February 2011

This is out of 8 people.

  • 5 people liked Cirrus.
  • 5 people liked Frequency Grid.
  • 4 people thought Links was useful, while one person did not like Links.
  • 3 people thought Summary was good and 1 person thought it was not useful.
  • 2 people liked Reader.
  • 2 people thought Reader was not effective since it was too small.
  • 2 people thought the window was too small.
  • One person liked that you could scrape particular issues in an article.
  • One person did not like the diffusion of tools.
  • One person found it hard to see the functionality of the tool.


  • 5 people would like searchability or link ability for articles.
  • 2 people would find a concordance useful.
  • One person would like the Links to navigate between articles in the entire journal.
  • One person would like a tool to conduct text analysis on all articles in journal.
  • One person would like a trend list to find trends in a particular field.
  • One person would like summary to link to an article.
  • One person would like collocates.
  • One person would like Voyeur on Omeca.
  • One person would like more visualizations.
  • One person would like link analysis.
  • One person would like a TEI wrapper.
  • One person would like a personography/placeography markup.


  • 2 people would like the visualizations to bring all 6 tools together.
  • One person said readers are suspicious of text analysis since it is seen as a bibliographical searching.
  • One person said there are too many options that will overwhelm users.
  • One person said it was good for quantitative research.
  • One person said it would be better if based in the cloud.
  • One person said it needs more robust digitization tools.
Retrieved from "https://circa.cs.ualberta.ca/index.php/CIRCA:Viral_Analytics_interview_Results"
Personal tools