CIRCA:Viral Analytics interview Results
From CIRCA
(Difference between revisions)
AshleyMoroz (Talk | contribs) (Created page with '* 3 people said frequency grid was good. * 3 people said cirrus was good. * 3 people said links was good. * 2 people said summary was not useful. * 3 people liked that links li…') |
AshleyMoroz (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | * | + | * 5 people liked Cirrus. |
| - | * | + | * 5 people liked Frequency Grid. |
| - | * 3 people | + | * 4 people thought links was useful, while one person did not like links. |
| + | * 2 people liked reader. | ||
| + | * 2 people thought it was not effective since it was too small. | ||
| + | * 3 people thought Summary was good and 1 person thought it was not useful. | ||
| + | * 2 people thought the window was too small. | ||
| + | * One person liked that you could scrape particular issues in an article. | ||
| + | * One person did not like the diffusion of tools. | ||
| + | * One person found it hard to see the functionality of the tool. | ||
| - | * 2 people | + | * 2 people would find a concordance useful. |
| + | * One person would like the Links to navigate between articles. | ||
| + | * 5 people would like searchability or link ability for articles. | ||
| + | * One person would like a tool to conduct text analysis on all articles in journal. | ||
| + | * One person would like a trend list to find trends in a particular field. | ||
| + | * One person would like summary to link to an article. | ||
| + | * One person would like collocates. | ||
| + | * One person would like Voyeur on Omeca. | ||
| + | * One person would like more visualizations. | ||
| + | * One person would like link analysis. | ||
| + | * One person would like a TEI wrapper. | ||
| + | * One person would like a personography/placeography markup. | ||
| - | * | + | * One person said readers are suspicious of text analysis since it is seen as a bibliographical searching. |
| - | * | + | * One person said there are too many options that will overwhelm users. |
| + | * One person said it was good for quantitative research. | ||
| + | * One person said it would be better if based in the cloud. | ||
| + | * One person said it needs more robust digitization tools. | ||
| + | * 2 people would like visulizations to bring together all 6 tools. | ||
Revision as of 18:37, 10 February 2011
- 5 people liked Cirrus.
- 5 people liked Frequency Grid.
- 4 people thought links was useful, while one person did not like links.
- 2 people liked reader.
- 2 people thought it was not effective since it was too small.
- 3 people thought Summary was good and 1 person thought it was not useful.
- 2 people thought the window was too small.
- One person liked that you could scrape particular issues in an article.
- One person did not like the diffusion of tools.
- One person found it hard to see the functionality of the tool.
- 2 people would find a concordance useful.
- One person would like the Links to navigate between articles.
- 5 people would like searchability or link ability for articles.
- One person would like a tool to conduct text analysis on all articles in journal.
- One person would like a trend list to find trends in a particular field.
- One person would like summary to link to an article.
- One person would like collocates.
- One person would like Voyeur on Omeca.
- One person would like more visualizations.
- One person would like link analysis.
- One person would like a TEI wrapper.
- One person would like a personography/placeography markup.
- One person said readers are suspicious of text analysis since it is seen as a bibliographical searching.
- One person said there are too many options that will overwhelm users.
- One person said it was good for quantitative research.
- One person said it would be better if based in the cloud.
- One person said it needs more robust digitization tools.
- 2 people would like visulizations to bring together all 6 tools.
