CIRCA:Ethics Correction

From CIRCA

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
*[[CIRCA: Ethic Changes Part 1|Ethic Changes Part 1]]
*[[CIRCA: Ethic Changes Part 1|Ethic Changes Part 1]]
-
==2.1 Study Objectives and Design==
+
=2.1=
-
Describe ethic procedures with the end of project interviews.
+
The term group-sourcing is a smaller crowdsourcing project, this lets us monitor the project closely and experiment with academic “group-sourcing.” This term was coined by Dr. Natalie Kononenko.  
-
* One on one in person interviews
+
-
* Will they be recorded or transcribed?
+
-
* Add another questionnaire for the interview.
+
-
* Add informed consent for the end-of-project interviews.
+
-
We need to add a project timeline for the participants in the informed consent document.  
+
The transcriptions and translations will not be sent back to the participants to be approved. Once the documents are submitted by the participants we assume that they are confident in their work.  
-
* Workshop/questionnaire, types of data they will be expected to input in the website, and the final interview.
+
-
* This is to give the participants a complete picture of the entire study.
+
-
The distribution of tasks.
+
An end of semester interview conducted by Megan Sellmer will be conducted through telephone or email. The interviewer will take notes throughout the process and record selected quotes that will be anonymous for any publication. A Humanities Computing research assistant Megan Sellmer will do data entry of both the workshop questionnaire and this final interview. These interviews will be private, and stored electronically (for five years).  
-
* Who will be conducting the interviews?
+
-
* What is our role as a PI along side Natalie.
+
-
Will the edited translations or transcriptions be sent to the participants to approve them before they are posted?
+
=4.4=
-
If we want to learn the participants’ perception of group sourcing, we need to define it (and indicate this aspect we want to learn).
+
All participants will be informed about the questionnaire and final interview in the consent form they sign at the beginning of their participation.  
-
Examples of each type of questions – for the survey, format for online data entry, and interview questions should be included.
+
If a participant wishes to withdraw (which they may do at any time), their transcriptions and translations will remain on the site but all identifying information will be removed.  
-
In attachment, fix the REB listing to ASL REB
+
The transcriptions and translations are kept on the website, as will all the audio clips that participants can “check out.”
-
==4.4 Informed Consent Determination==
+
=5.6=
-
Information about the end of the project interviews.
+
The default for submitted works will include the authors name, participants must say that they wish to remain anonymous. When researchers publish works about this project, they will not use direct quotations. Readers then will be unable to connect published works to participant’s contribution.
-
We state that the participants can choose to remove themselves and their work at any time.
+
The “comments”, “questions”, and “report a problem” that participants submit to administrators is private. Only the administrators have access to these observations.
-
* We need to include it in the letter of initial contact and the consent form.
+
-
* What information can and cannot be withdrawn?
+
-
Include what exactly will be on the Internet.  
+
=6.2=
-
==5.6 Sound or Image (other than audio- or video-taped interviews) or Material Created by Participants==
+
2.0: The questionnaire for the workshop will be distributed as text handout, and the end of semester interview will be electronic text or by phone. These questionnaires will help us understand the volunteers view of the website, what their motivations for the project were, and generally the success of this group-sourcing project.
-
We should have the default for crediting submitted works as anonymous, and only connect the names of the participants to their work if they expressly state.
+
4.0: The information will be stored as coded numbers for the next five years.
-
* '''Problem'' 'This is contrary to Natalie’s Ethics.
+
-
* Reason we link their names directly to their work is to give the participants a sense of cultural pride by contributing to the field.
+
-
'''Problem''': We state that the researchers will look at the work anonymously, but what is to stop them from going on to the site and connecting the dots between author and work.
+
=6.3=
-
* Or will we know those that choose not to remain anonymous, and not know those who did – publishing none of the names
+
-
* Can readers of articles connect who the author is in the research through our description?
+
-
Will the participant’s names be connected with the comments, questions and report a problem?
+
Add information of end of semester interviews
-
 
+
-
==6.2 Data Identifiers==
+
-
 
+
-
2.0: When and in what format (orally, through a written questionnaire, etc) will these questions be posed to participants? What is their relevance to your research? Why are they not included in your questionnaire?
+
-
 
+
-
4.0: Should we keep the participants names or use coded numbers?
+
-
 
+
-
==6.3 Data Confidentiality and Privacy==
+
-
 
+
-
Add information regarding the end of project interviews.
+
3.0: A confidentiality agreement will be signed at the beginning of volunteer participation.
3.0: A confidentiality agreement will be signed at the beginning of volunteer participation.
-
==6.4 Data Storage, Retention, and Disposal==
+
=6.4=
-
 
+
-
Question: Is the data going to be transferred from the TAPoR database? If yes, how will that work?
+
-
 
+
-
Add to 2.0: The files will be erased after five years.
+
-
 
+
-
==Questions==
+
-
 
+
-
'''Will the edited translations or transcriptions be sent to the participants to approve them before they are posted?'''
+
-
 
+
-
*Natalie says no, she doesn't see the point.
+
-
 
+
-
'''What information can and cannot be withdrawn by the participants?'''
+
-
 
+
-
*Natalie said, "They can withdraw all identifying information, that is information about themselves. The text and/or translation. It just becomes anonymous."
+
-
 
+
-
'''Will the participant’s names be connected with the comments, questions and report a problem?'''
+
-
 
+
-
*Natalie said, "I would like that to be at the discretion of the participants, if possible. What we need is to have that information for our own purposes. But this need not be public information unless people want it to be."
+
-
'''Should we keep the participants names or use coded numbers when we store the data for 5 years?'''
+
The data will remain on the TAPoR database.
-
*Natalie said, "My guess would be that coding would be preferred just in case some people do want to withdraw identifying info.
+
2.0: The files will be erased after five years.

Revision as of 23:45, 17 February 2011

Contents

2.1

The term group-sourcing is a smaller crowdsourcing project, this lets us monitor the project closely and experiment with academic “group-sourcing.” This term was coined by Dr. Natalie Kononenko.

The transcriptions and translations will not be sent back to the participants to be approved. Once the documents are submitted by the participants we assume that they are confident in their work.

An end of semester interview conducted by Megan Sellmer will be conducted through telephone or email. The interviewer will take notes throughout the process and record selected quotes that will be anonymous for any publication. A Humanities Computing research assistant Megan Sellmer will do data entry of both the workshop questionnaire and this final interview. These interviews will be private, and stored electronically (for five years).

4.4

All participants will be informed about the questionnaire and final interview in the consent form they sign at the beginning of their participation.

If a participant wishes to withdraw (which they may do at any time), their transcriptions and translations will remain on the site but all identifying information will be removed.

The transcriptions and translations are kept on the website, as will all the audio clips that participants can “check out.”

5.6

The default for submitted works will include the authors name, participants must say that they wish to remain anonymous. When researchers publish works about this project, they will not use direct quotations. Readers then will be unable to connect published works to participant’s contribution.

The “comments”, “questions”, and “report a problem” that participants submit to administrators is private. Only the administrators have access to these observations.

6.2

2.0: The questionnaire for the workshop will be distributed as text handout, and the end of semester interview will be electronic text or by phone. These questionnaires will help us understand the volunteers view of the website, what their motivations for the project were, and generally the success of this group-sourcing project.

4.0: The information will be stored as coded numbers for the next five years.

6.3

Add information of end of semester interviews

3.0: A confidentiality agreement will be signed at the beginning of volunteer participation.

6.4

The data will remain on the TAPoR database.

2.0: The files will be erased after five years.

Personal tools